Composition – Thoughts at 2,000 Hours
Further Musings on Composition
Thoughts at 2,000 Hours
My aim with this post is to dig a little deeper into the area of composition. My first post on this subject: “Composition – Early Thoughts” recognized that this was an area of potential for growth, i.e., weakness, for me and laid out the basics of what I knew, pretty much at the start of my 10,000 hour project. In the 16 months since that post, and 2,000 hours of deliberate practice later, I understand a little more about both the psychology that underpins best photographic practice and the practical application of this knowledge.
As photographers we strive to create an image that:
- Piques and maintains the viewer’s interest
- Guides the viewer around the image concentrating on the key subject
- Conveys the desired story or emotion
- Achieves the above in the simplest, most efficient manner.
Whilst my first post covered the rules of composition, I tend these days to think in terms of pictorial elements and how their placement contributes or otherwise towards a successful image.
I am always delighted to receive feedback, and feedback is essential for this project as a whole. So, if you have any comments, ideas or suggestions, please post them below.
To see more posts on other photographic topics, or to follow my learning progress, please like or follow me on the social media channel of your choice to the right.
Diptychs, Triptychs and Polyptychs
Diptych, Triptych, Polyptych
In the last year or so some of my most successful competition entries have been in the form of Diptych or Triptychs. This post is an attempt to consolidate my thoughts regarding what makes a successful Diptych (Triptych or other Polyptych).
I define success as the whole being greater than the sum of the parts. For example the picture to the right, which was roundly applauded in competition at the Amersham Photographic Society, consists of two sub-images which on their own are OK but too simplistic to hold the viewer’s attention for long.
As usual, if you have any questions or comments, please post them below.
To see more posts on other photographic topics, or to follow my learning progress, please like or follow me on the social media channel of your choice to the right.
First Notes on the History of Photography as an Art Form
“Is Photography Art?” The History of this Question
It strikes me that photographers of all eras have suffered a sense of insecurity as to whether what they are doing qualifies as art.
The challenge of the early photographer was to elevate their art above that of a merely scientific process. Today, this problem has largely been superseded by the need to separate the artistic from the mundane amidst the vast quantity of images produced by digital cameras everywhere.
The purpose of this post is a first attempt at assigning a historical context to the various photographic movements I have encountered and the styles or techniques associated with them. These include:
- Pictorialism, i.e., “arty photography”
- Modernism – experimental “wacky” stuff, influenced by cubism and surrealism
- Californian Modernism – technically perfect straight natural photography
- Reportage – shocking straight humanist photography
- Late modernism – extreme abstraction, minimalism, conceptualism
- Post-Modernism – constructed “snapshot” aesthetic; sometimes difficult for the untrained eye (I include myself here) to differentiate from images made by a child with a smartphone.
Although it is possible to indicate times when various approaches first appeared, or were most fashionable, many of these trends progressed in parallel, and are still around today.
Please help.
This is a long way from a comprehensive review of the major movements and is certainly a post I hope to revise over time. If you have any comments or suggestions please add them below or the social media channel of your choice to the right.
Thank you.
Composition – Early Thoughts
The composition of a photographic image is the author’s arrangement of elements within the image.
Photographically, composition is influenced by all aspect at the disposal of the photographer including: their position, framing of the image (both in camera and with subsequent cropping), and determining the zone of focus.
At the start of my 10,000 hour journey to become a better photographer, one area of weakness was (is) composition. My Thaxted Windmill and Church Spire apparently is “poorly composed.” In particular:
- Two elements of roughly equal significance
- Similar heights in the frame
The more I worked on this post, the more complicated it became. So I’m just going to give mention to a number of important areas with a view to returning to them in greater detail in follow-up posts.
This is a topic I hope to review regularly. If you have any comments on this post, please post them below.
To see more posts on other photographic topics, or to follow my learning progress, please like or follow me on the social media channel of your choice to the right.